Skip to main content

Photo Mugging


As this first week of June winds down, so does the graduation season. Many commencement ceremonies have taken place already in the city, releasing hoards of job seekers and setting adrift the "what next?" crowd. It's an exciting time, a milestone—one you want to record for posterity. And it's pretty safe to say that when you record it, you want to do so without background interference. What follows is a significant confession. Consider it also an apology to countless high school graduates from the year of, I think, 1985. We don't know what came over us; we just couldn't help ourselves. I remember that it started as an accident. My mother and I were in New York City, at Lincoln Center. I don't think we'd seen any performances—perhaps we'd come from the library branch there that focuses on the performing arts—but anyway we were there around lunchtime. The weather was lovely, perfect for sitting in the seasonal cafe that in those days was always set up in the plaza. This dining area was sectioned off from the rest of the outdoor space by a rectangular configuration of large planters giving root to boxy, shrub-like plants. At the time we were seated, just next to the greenery, the plaza was empty. Soon, however, scores of youth in blue caps and gowns (and white tassels, if memory serves me well) flooded the open space around us with their families. They had just received their diplomas, probably walking across the stage at Avery Fisher Hall. We heard the noise of celebration, and of course we were curious to find out what was going on. In order to see, we either had to stand up, which we weren't going to do, or else peek through the plants, which was easier and of course much more discreet. How were we to know that a family photographer would be releasing the shutter of his camera (I remember it was a man), right at that exact moment? We were a bit to the side of the assembled group, but not by much. Clearly we'd gotten in the picture. We pulled back from the plants, horrified for a millisecond before the hilarity set in—and not before seeing a look of puzzlement on the photographer's face. He'd seen something . . . but didn't seem to be sure what it was. Often I think people just don't see the unexpected for what it is. Why should he suspect, as he was readying the camera, that a couple of white faces would peek out from the bushes? I say "white faces." Not that I would usually make an issue of race, but in the interest of cultural irony, this might be the time to mention that the graduating class could easily have been from Harlem or some other neighborhood that, at that particular time in the city's history, was almost exclusively black. The reversal of some horrible, racist kind of stereotype came to mind: while perhaps at some time, some white people imagined blacks as savages living in the jungles of Africa (god knows, there are probably some ridiculous drawings of black faces peering out of the bushes somewhere), here we were, two pale-faced fools in the background of an otherwise civilized tableau of educated black people. And did it end there? Of course not. As I said before, I don't know what came over us, but we saw extreme humor in the situation, and so we went on a spree of what we later came to refer to as "photo mugging." The space in front of the planters, on the other side from our table, seemed to attract a lot of groups looking for a scenic shot, so we had plenty of victims. We'd wait until someone counted "One . . . Two . . ." and on three we'd part the leaves and peek out, then vanish again. It's incredible that no one noticed, or if they did they didn't say a word. From the cafe side, we realized at some point that our bad behavior was very much on display, and eventually we called off the photo mugging for the afternoon. We'd start laughing uncontrollably, however, each time we thought of the days or years to come—the surprise of seeing our faces in the photos (remember, this is before digital cameras, so the contents of the photos were unknown until the process of film development and printing was complete), and then the class reunions. We imagined friends talking later: would they compare notes and shake their heads, amazed to see us in several sets of photos? It's a story we have told each other many times over the years, wondering at our own nerve. Are we ashamed of ourselves? Maybe a little. Feeling remorse? I admit, not a lot. It remains one of our greatest, craziest collaborations. Of course we'd never do anything like that now. In a digital world of instant editing and PhotoShop capabilities, we'd never stand a chance. Class of 2009, consider yourselves lucky.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tap Root Manuscript

Here is an early music memory: I am very young. If not still a toddler, then not much older. I am running around the living room, squealing with unrestrained delight, while my dad chases me to the tune of "I Am the Lion" by Neil Diamond (Ba-pa-la ding-ga!). He's reached deep down and pulled out his big baritone voice—the one he also used for "Old Man River" on occasion; the one that always awed me. It's the early 1970s, and although hopelessly pop and showy, there is no shame in liking Neil Diamond. Not at this time. Later, I'd go through nearly two decades of keeping this (admittedly) often schmaltzy artist at more than arm's length. When I bothered to remember Neil Diamond, which generally I didn't, I thought of him more like a skeleton in my musical closet; a dirty little secret that, if exposed, would set me up for some heavy razzing from friends. I don't remember when it was that I recovered my dad's Tap Root Manuscript album. It wa...

Black Kids Read, Too

The worst kind of prejudice is the kind that slips under the radar. It's too subtle to cause a stir (and if you point it out, you'll usually get a sideways look: you're the one making too much of nothing), but its corrosive message nevertheless seeps in—subliminally, insidiously—beating down the spirit of the group it belittles or excludes. I am blessed to have been raised by two parents who were sensitive to prejudicial undercurrents; they fought against them in their own distinct ways through the tumultuous 1960s, and into the 70s and 80s as I was growing up. And it seems, thinking about it now, that they never missed a good learning moment with me: we often discussed issues of bias, prejudice, stereotype, and their harmful effects. This week, images in some of my kindergartener's reading books gave me pause. And in wrestling with how to handle these, I remembered something I hadn't thought of in many years: the library at the Brentwood Science Magnet School in ...

Touch Typing

Between seventh and eighth grades (or between eighth and ninth?) the deal was this: if I wanted to take an art class in summer school, I had to take typing. So said Mom. Although I didn't mind being in an art studio soldering bits of stained glass together, the thought of staying inside, seated in front of a typewriter when I could see the sun in its beautiful blue sky out the window, was torture. Still, I sat there. Such is the suffering one will endure for art! I typed the home keys in order, hundreds of times: a-s-d-f-g-h-j-k-l-;. I stretched my fingers up for T and Y and down for B. I did pages of the prototype sentence, "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dogs." Yes, it has every letter of the alphabet in it at least once. I learned to automatically put two spaces after each period. (I have had a hard time undoing this habit, but a copy editor's job these days is often to make sure there is only one space following a complete sentence!) It's fair to say...